tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2877736243057942640.post7912648833544555371..comments2023-09-18T08:24:08.498-07:00Comments on kshell: "The Dark Art of Description"kshellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14297834175964334868noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2877736243057942640.post-83637497989777821162010-03-14T20:52:24.738-07:002010-03-14T20:52:24.738-07:00Way to use quotes. Rachel will love that. And it...Way to use quotes. Rachel will love that. And it is probably a good idea.<br /><br />I totally agree with you and think that you used evidence to strengthen your argument that was more or less rock solid to begin with. So what the heck am I supposed to say? I want to get full credit, but you said it all. So I shall ramble in hopes of receiving high marks, because there really is nothing else to say. <br /><br />This isn't the same sort of thing as Fridley. I can't really describe the crap out of this and make it seem interesting. Perhaps I could say that would be the hole in her argument. There are things out there that cannot be fixed with a tablespoon of description and teaspoon of word choice. See, I just made it sound like a recipe, and now I feel like a moron.<br /><br />It is ridiculous to me that she wasted her time writing 9 pages on how decription makes a story something more. I know that. We all do.Graham Bennetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02170024218290969051noreply@blogger.com